Could cooling system inefficiency actually make detection easier for us than for the aliens?

This is a clever question, but the provided preprints don't directly address the asymmetry you're asking about — whether cooling *inefficiency* makes detectable signatures easier for us than for a hypothetical alien observer.

What the archive does address is related but distinct: how cooling (or heating) mechanisms can *enhance* detectability. For instance, anomalous cooling or heating of neutron stars due to exotic physics — like coherent scattering with relic neutrinos or sterile dark matter — actually makes those stars *brighter* (or keeps them hotter) than standard models predict, which paradoxically makes them *easier* to spot with infrared telescopes like JWST [AG-2024.08-927]. Similarly, dark matter annihilation heating of distant objects like Planet 9 could generate detectable thermal radio emission from an otherwise dark body [AG-2026.04-336].

The underlying principle is that inefficient cooling (or active heating) leaves energy in the system longer, producing observable radiation. But whether this favors Earth-based observers over hypothetical alien technology depends on factors the preprints don't explore: their detection wavelengths, sensor sensitivity, proximity to the source, and what they're actively looking for.

To properly answer your question — whether inefficiency asymmetrically advantages one observer over another — you'd need papers on comparative detection strategies or the detectability horizon as a function of observer location and equipment.