How do perturbation modes behave differently on stealth versus non-stealth black hole backgrounds?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Perturbation modes behave fundamentally differently on stealth versus non stealth black hole backgrounds because the stealth field introduces an additional field degree of freedom that can shift thermodynamic and spectral properties without changing the metric itself. What makes stealth backgrounds special A stealth black hole is geometrically identical to a general relativistic black hole—same metric, same curvature—but carries a non trivial scalar field that doesn't back react on spacetime [AG 2024.10 358]. This is the crucial difference: perturbations see two distinct environments. On a non stealth Schwarzschild background, perturbation modes (quasinormal modes, scalar and gravitational waves) are governed purely by the metric geometry. On a stealth background, the same metric geometry must coexist with the additional scalar field. That field can interact with perturbations in ways the metric alone cannot. How thermodynamics splits them apart While the geometries are indistinguishable, their thermodynamics diverge [AG 2024.10 358]. Stealth black holes generically exhibit shifted mass and entropy compared to their GR counterparts, arising from boundary terms contributed by the stealth field in the variational procedure. There is a special case—the "bona fide stealth"—where a scalar field accompanies an (A)dS Schwarzschild black hole with no thermodynamic shift, showing that the splitting is field dependent, not universal. This matters because thermodynamic properties couple to perturbation dynamics through boundary conditions and conserved charges. Perturbation modes themselves The archive does not contain direct comparisons of quasinormal mode spectra between stealth and non stealth backgrounds. However, we can infer the mechanism: When you perturb a stealth system, you can excite non geometrical perturbations —changes to the scalar field that leave the metric invariant [AG 2025.04 793]. In dust dominated stealth backgrounds, such perturbations satisfy a scalar field equation with a hierarchical structure in perturbation parameter λ, with the linear term dominating the solution. This is qualitatively different from a standard black hole, where all perturbations are geometrical (they change the metric). By contrast, on non stealth Schwarzschild backgrounds, all physical perturbations deform the metric. The quasinormal spectrum responds to changes in the effective potential governing wave propagation [AG 2024.10 292, AG 2026.01 178]. Weak localised perturbations to this potential cause resonances to migrate smoothly in the complex plane [AG 2026.01 178], eventually approaching a hard wall limit. The deeper implication The key distinction: stealth backgrounds allow a hidden degree of freedom . Perturbations can couple to both the metric and the scalar field, creating a richer dynamical landscape. On a standard black hole, there is no such hidden channel—the mode structure is fully encoded in geometry alone. This suggests stealth black holes might exhibit richer mode mixing, altered decay timescales, and mode dependent thermodynamic effects that have no counterpart in GR. The provided preprints do not directly compare quasinormal mode spectra or decay rates between stealth and non stealth black holes.