AG-2025.06-1344·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: hep-ph
Simple quintessence models in light of DESI-BAO observations
Authors
- James M. Cline
- Varun Muralidharan
Abstract
Recent analyses from the DESI collaboration suggest that the dark energy density of the Universe may be decreasing with time, slowing the acceleration of the scale factor $a$. Typically these studies are performed assuming an ansatz for the equation of state $w(a)$. In this work, we instead consider simple models of a scalar quintessence potential with linear and quadratic behavior, which could be more representative of real models than particular parametrizations of $w(a)$. We observe a significant preference for dynamical dark energy when using supernova data from DESY5 along with DESI BAO and Planck data, at the cost of slightly exacerbating the Hubble tension. However, when using supernova data from Pantheon+ or Union3, we find only a mild preference for dynamical dark energy.
Submitted
16 June 202510 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2506.13047
Summary
Recent cosmic measurements hint that dark energy might be weakening over time rather than constant, and simple scalar field models fit this pattern better than traditional parameterizations—though the fit quality depends on which supernova dataset you use.
- DESI's new baryon acoustic oscillation measurements show hints that dark energy density decreases with cosmic time, contradicting the standard cosmological model where it remains constant.
- Simple quintessence models (where dark energy is a scalar field with quadratic or linear potential) fit the data more naturally than ad-hoc mathematical parameterizations of dark energy's properties.
- The statistical evidence for time-varying dark energy is robust with older supernova data but weaker with newer datasets, suggesting systematic uncertainties in supernova measurements still matter for this conclusion.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.