AG-2025.02-572·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMgr-qc
How Theory-laden are Observations of Black Holes?
Authors
- Juliusz Doboszewski
- Jamee Elder
Abstract
We evaluate the roles general relativistic assumptions play in simulations used in recent observations of black holes including LIGO-Virgo and the Event Horizon Telescope. In both experiments simulations play an ampliative role, enabling the extraction of more information from the data than would be possible otherwise. This comes at a cost of theory-ladenness. We discuss the issue of inferential circularity, which arises in some applications; classify some of the epistemic strategies used to reduce the extent of theory-ladenness; and discuss ways in which these strategies are model independent.
Submitted
14 February 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2502.10541
Summary
Recent black hole observations from LIGO and the Event Horizon Telescope rely heavily on simulations built from general relativity, raising questions about how much we're actually observing versus inferring from theory.
- Simulations don't just process data—they extract information that wouldn't be visible otherwise, but this amplification comes with hidden assumptions baked into the models.
- The paper identifies 'inferential circularity': a risk that we confirm general relativity by using general relativity to interpret the signals, potentially missing alternative theories.
- The authors catalog strategies physicists use to reduce theory-dependence (like checking multiple independent models), showing some can work without committing fully to one theoretical framework.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.