AG-2024.11-1092·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: hep-ph
A Bayesian Model of Credence in Low Energy Supersymmetry
Authors
- Richard Dawid
- James D. Wells
Abstract
We carry out a quantitative Bayesian analysis of the evolution of credences in low energy supersymmetry (SUSY) in light of the most relevant empirical data. The analysis is based on the assumption that observers apply principles of optimism or pessimism about theory building in a coherent way. On this basis, we provide a rough assessment of the current range of plausible credences in low energy SUSY and determine in which way LHC data changes those credences. For observers who had been optimistic about low energy SUSY before the LHC, the method reports that LHC data does lead to decreased credences in accordance with intuition. The decrease is moderate, however, and keeps posteriors at very substantial levels. The analysis further establishes that a very high but not yet indefensible degree of pessimism regarding the success chances of theory building still results in quite significant credences in GUT and low energy SUSY for the time right before the start of the LHC. The pessimist's credence in low energy SUSY remains nearly unchanged once LHC data is taken into account.
Submitted
5 November 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2411.03232
Summary
Physicists use Bayesian statistics to quantify how much belief in supersymmetry should change based on LHC data, finding that even pessimists about the theory assign it substantial odds.
- The paper applies Bayesian reasoning to track how experimental evidence should rationally shift physicists' confidence in low-energy supersymmetry, a leading candidate for physics beyond the Standard Model.
- Optimists saw their belief in supersymmetry decrease moderately after LHC results, but remained substantially confident—suggesting the theory wasn't decisively ruled out by null results.
- Even deeply skeptical physicists, applying consistent pessimistic assumptions about theory-building, still assigned meaningful probability to supersymmetry before the LHC, and LHC data barely budged their assessment.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.