AG-2024.11-015·physics.class-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SRgr-qc
Newtonian restricted three-body gravitational problem with positive and negative point masses
Authors
- K. H. Thong
- A. Melatos
Abstract
The Newtonian restricted three-body problem involving a positive primary point mass, $m_+$, and a negative secondary point mass, $m_-$, in a circular orbit, and a positive or negative tertiary point mass, $m_3$, with $m_+ > |m_-| \gg |m_3|$, is solved. Five Lagrange points are found for $m_3$, three of which are coplanar with $m_+$ and $m_-$, and two of which are not, a subtle consequence of the gravitational repulsion from $m_-$. All Lagrange points are linearly unstable, except for one point in the regime $m_+ \gtrsim 8.4 |m_-|$, which is linearly stable and collinear with $m_+$ and $m_-$.
Submitted
1 November 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2411.00933
Summary
Researchers analyzed the gravitational dynamics of a system with two large masses (one positive, one negative) orbiting together, finding five equilibrium points where a third mass can sit still—including one stable point that emerges only when the positive mass dominates strongly enough.
- Negative mass, though exotic, creates mathematically consistent dynamics: it repels other masses gravitationally rather than attracting them, changing where equilibrium points can exist.
- Two of the five equilibrium points lie outside the orbital plane, an unusual feature caused by the repulsive gravity from the negative mass counteracting the attractive gravity from the positive mass.
- One equilibrium point becomes stable (small perturbations die out) when the positive mass exceeds about 8.4 times the magnitude of the negative mass, offering a concrete testbed for studying stability in systems with exotic matter.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.