AG-2024.04-166·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-th
Emergent Modified Gravity
Authors
- Martin Bojowald
- Erick I. Duque
Abstract
A complete canonical formulation of general covariance makes it possible to construct new modified theories of gravity that are not of higher-curvature form, as shown here in a spherically symmetric setting. The usual uniqueness theorems are evaded by using a crucial and novel ingredient, allowing for fundamental fields of gravity distinct from an emergent space-time metric that provides a geometrical structure to all solutions. As specific examples, there are new expansion-shear couplings in cosmological models, a form of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) can appear in a space-time covariant theory without introducing extra fields, and related effects help to make effective models of canonical quantum gravity fully consistent with general covariance.
Submitted
9 April 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2404.06375
Summary
By separating fundamental gravitational fields from the emergent spacetime metric they generate, researchers construct novel modified gravity theories that sidestep classical uniqueness theorems and naturally produce effects like MOND without extra fields.
- A careful canonical (constraint-based) treatment of general covariance reveals room to build modified gravity theories that aren't just higher-curvature corrections—the key is letting fundamental fields differ from the metric we observe.
- The framework naturally produces MOND-like behavior in a fully covariant theory, avoiding the usual problem that such modifications break Einstein's principle that physics works the same in all reference frames.
- This approach helps reconcile effective models from quantum gravity with general covariance, suggesting a bridge between quantum corrections and classical gravitational modifications.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.