AG-2024.02-469·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-thmath.QA
Quantum Gravity: are we there yet?
Authors
- Shahn Majid
Abstract
The turn of the millennium was a time of optimism about an approach to noncommutative geometry inspired by rich mathematical objects called `quantum groups' and its applications to quantum spacetime. This would model quantum gravity effects as noncommutativity of spacetime coordinates and was arguably going to solve quantum gravity itself. It took a further 20 years from that point to develop a particularly suitable formalism of `quantum Riemannian geometry', but this was largely done and has begun to be used to construct baby quantum gravity models. In this article, we obtain new results for state of the art fuzzy sphere and n-gon models in this approach. We also review what are some elements of quantum gravity that we can already see and what are the critical conceptual and mathematical elements that are still missing to more fully achieve this goal.
Submitted
28 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.18536
Summary
A mathematical framework for quantum gravity based on noncommutative geometry has matured enough to build working models; this paper tests it on simplified examples and identifies what's still needed to handle realistic gravity.
- Quantum Riemannian geometry—a formalism treating spacetime coordinates as non-commuting quantum objects rather than classical numbers—is now concrete enough to build toy quantum gravity models and test ideas.
- New results for 'fuzzy sphere' and polygon models show the framework can produce sensible geometric structures at quantum scales, validating the mathematical approach.
- The field has moved from speculative hope (circa 2000) to working prototypes, but major gaps remain in connecting these toy models to observable physics and general relativity.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.